乔治亚州，亚特兰大

5871 Glenride Drive
Suite 350
Atlanta, Georgia 30328

atlanta@pkhip.com

T: +1 (770) 927-7802
F: +1 (877) 389-6779

最近的洞察力

特色

March 29, 2025

USPTO Revises Procedure for Discretionary Denials in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings

March 29, 2025

On March 24, 2025, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a memorandum providing guidance on its recent decision to rescind the "Interim Procedure for Discretionary Denials in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings with Parallel District Court Litigation." This change reverts policy to pre-2022 guidance, specifically the precedential decisions in Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc. and Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corp.

阅读更多→

March 29, 2025

March 24, 2025

Brad Groff Receives Super Lawyers Recognition

March 24, 2025

Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP proudly congratulates Brad Groff on being named to Super Lawyers for the 19th consecutive year. This prestigious recognition is a testament to Brad’s deep expertise in intellectual property law and his dedication to delivering outstanding results for our clients. Brad is widely known in Atlanta and nationwide.

阅读更多→

March 24, 2025

March 22, 2025

Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP Celebrates Three Years of Growth

March 22, 2025

Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP, a boutique intellectual property law firm, proudly marks its third anniversary, celebrating significant growth and the opening of a new satellite office in Boca Raton, Florida.

阅读更多→

March 22, 2025

March 13, 2025

PKH Welcomes Usha Parker

March 13, 2025

Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP is excited to welcome Usha Parker to the firm. With nearly two decades of experience in intellectual property law and a strong technical background, Usha brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise that will be invaluable to our clients.

阅读更多→

March 13, 2025

February 13, 2025

Federal Circuit Further Defines Eligibility Standard for Composition Patent

February 13, 2025

In US Synthetic Corp. v. ITC, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision providing useful guidance on the application of 35 U.S.C. § 101, which governs patent eligibility. Specifically, the court addressed whether the claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (the ’502 patent) were directed to an abstract idea and thus ineligible for patent protection. The case offers valuable clarification on how to assess claims involving physical compositions of matter under the two-step framework established by the Supreme Court in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International.

阅读更多→

February 13, 2025

February 12, 2025

Federal Circuit Clarifies Collateral Estoppel with respect to Inter Partes Review

February 12, 2025

In Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal of Kroy’s patent infringement claims on the grounds of collateral estoppel. The court clarified that inter partes review (IPR) decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which use a lower burden of proof, do not automatically preclude litigating related but unadjudicated patent claims in district court.

阅读更多→

February 12, 2025

乔治亚州，亚特兰大

5871 Glenride DriveSuite 350Atlanta, Georgia 30328

atlanta@pkhip.comT: +1 (770) 927-7802F: +1 (877) 389-6779

最近的洞察力

最近的洞察力

5871 Glenride Drive
Suite 350
Atlanta, Georgia 30328

atlanta@pkhip.com

T: +1 (770) 927-7802
F: +1 (877) 389-6779